loan scammer

Comments (2)

• A
  Anonymous Name1 month ago

  Applications which specify minimum monthly salary of 25000 Rs for a loan, perhaps is reliable. Still, before the job, or sustained min 6 month income of the same, if you applied for loan, it will turn fraud, in case someone sanctioned, as it cannot be legal. There are many who bypass with fraud job papers for the loan, and get the loan. Then start the business as claimed the loan for, rely on the business income to pay back the loan. Some sincerely pay back, and their previous method doesn't matter, but usually someone who hasn't worked for it at all, usually starts to lie more, than return the loan. When business gets income, in name of business being "business", they think nothing is to be paid, just like no work was needed to be done in real to get the loan, by changing the loan amount processed to being various payments or earnings instead from different people during their fake desk job, and claiming no loan was received from the bank. When loanbank checks bank record when no money back is received, only then they find the payment of loan there. Till, then anyone who even checked for loan, but didn't take get fraud messages, in order to steal the money in your bank for those frauds loan return. It perhaps is the black market stolen or purchased record of the loan company's reserved payment audit sheet, which too is concealed, but the fraud loan taker, named those payment directly to the person instead. Now the Jury faces two official documents. One that claims the amount is of the bank from the source of money, and one that the amount sent from different source to the loan taker, who's by now claiming they haven't taken any loan at all. Usually the fraud loan taker always wins, because in order to get the money back, these loan applications start sending fraud loan giving messages to many individuals too. So, in case they even loaned for real to one individual, because of the several fraud loan messages to those who really haven't loaned, companies can't prove they loaned to that individual they really did loan to either. It could get caught too, if they find the transaction of sending the loan, and receiving the loan. These days when normal cashiers ask for UPI transaction, though it's allowed, you can deny to give too, because on time paid to paid transactions aren't loans, and they maybe categorising your payments as loan you are paying or anything. If it's too enter in computer, they can ask. Still manually feeding transaction details of paid amount, which will reflect in bank anyway. Why are they filling their phones with photos of our phone, bank details, id payment, I MEAN, THAT'S VERY PRIVATE, might as well say, "*********************************" instead. These R*F*M shops, even have Loud speakers declaring payment, digital, cameras over head, and then they want photo of phones. PRETTY, PRETTY, PRETTY. Say It. 😹 This take a photo of every transaction even in shopping store is very fraud. Cruel Friends and Google AI says, even an employed teacher having s* with running students is so great, doesn't mean it is legal, allowed, permitted, or even allowing the education system to work. Example: Paper Leaks. Emails exchanged for the loan details, documents clearing equivalent to the loan, and proof of false basis of the other people's income being included under someone else's name without them being an employer, or other income sheets of different individuals(perhaps dead), instead could help prove loan given.

  0
• I
  I'm Lithe1 month ago

  You have missed out on this, which processing fee gets deducted from the loan given failed.

  1